CRIMINAL DEFENSE PROCESS LAW — CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Hearing in California — What It Is and How to Use It
The preliminary hearing is a critical stage in California felony cases. The prosecution must show probable cause to hold the defendant for trial — and the defense can cross-examine witnesses, challenge evidence, and win partial or full dismissal.
Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney
On This Page
Jump to a Section
Quick Reference
Preliminary Hearing California — At a Glance
- Law / Code
- PC §859b / PC §866 / PC §872
- Classification
- Criminal Procedure — Felony Cases
- Maximum Penalty
- N/A — procedural stage
- Probation Eligible
- N/A
- Strike Offense
- N/A
What Is Preliminary Hearing California Under California Law?
Legal Framework. A preliminary hearing is the evidentiary screening hearing in a California felony prosecution. At the hearing, a magistrate decides whether there is sufficient cause to believe a felony has been committed and the defendant is guilty of it. Penal Code § 872(a) requires the magistrate to hold the defendant to answer when that showing is made; otherwise, the complaint must be dismissed. The prosecution’s burden is probable cause, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge may rely on admissible evidence and, under Penal Code § 872(b), qualified hearsay testimony from a law-enforcement officer under Proposition 115. The defense may cross-examine witnesses, object to evidence, present evidence, and argue that one or more counts or allegations lack the required evidentiary basis.
The Prosecution's Burden. Timing is governed principally by Penal Code § 859b. A defendant in custody ordinarily has the right to a preliminary examination within 10 court days after arraignment or plea, and a defendant out of custody ordinarily has the right to a hearing within 60 calendar days after arraignment or plea, unless the defendant personally waives time or good cause supports a continuance. The preliminary hearing is not itself a misdemeanor-or-felony classification hearing: it is used in felony cases, including wobblers charged as felonies. If the magistrate holds the defendant to answer, the prosecutor generally files an information in superior court under Penal Code § 739, followed by arraignment on the information and eventual trial or resolution.
Potential Consequences. A preliminary hearing differs from an arraignment, a trial, and a Penal Code § 995 motion. At arraignment, the court advises the accused of charges and rights; at trial, the People must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury or court. At the preliminary hearing, the magistrate can dismiss unsupported counts, reduce a felony complaint to a misdemeanor where authorized, or hold the accused to answer. After a bindover, the defense may challenge an unlawful commitment through a motion to set aside the information under Penal Code § 995. In Los Angeles County, felony preliminary hearings are conducted in the Superior Court, often with investigating LAPD or LASD personnel and civilian witnesses called by the District Attorney’s Office.
05 — Defense Strategies
How Rubin Law Defends Preliminary Hearing California Charges
Rubin Law, P.C. attacks the elements of PC §859b / PC §866 / PC §872 and drives outcomes that avoid conviction where possible.
Attack the Probable-Cause Showing
The People must offer evidence creating a strong suspicion that a crime occurred and that the defendant committed it; a charging allegation alone is not evidence. The defense can isolate a missing element, such as identity, intent, possession, causation, value, force, or lack of consent, depending on the alleged offense. Cross-examination may expose speculation, gaps in observation, inconsistent descriptions, weak identification procedures, or an absence of corroboration. Although the preliminary-hearing standard is lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the magistrate may not hold a defendant to answer on conjecture. A focused element-by-element argument can lead to dismissal of a count, removal of an enhancement, or a more favorable charging position.
U.S. Const. amend. IV
Use Cross-Examination to Preserve Testimony
A preliminary hearing is often the first meaningful opportunity to cross-examine key prosecution witnesses under oath. The defense can obtain specific commitments about what a witness saw, heard, remembered, reported, and did not know. Those answers become a transcript that can later be used to impeach the witness if the trial account changes. This is particularly important in identification cases, domestic-violence allegations, sexual-offense investigations, and cases built on a single complainant or informant. Effective questioning is disciplined: it tests perception, memory, bias, prior statements, and omissions without unnecessarily revealing the entire defense theory. Even where bindover is likely, a useful record can materially improve later motion practice, trial preparation, and negotiations.
17 CCR §1219.3
Challenge Proposition 115 Hearsay
Penal Code § 872(b) permits certain qualified law-enforcement officers to testify to hearsay at a preliminary hearing, but the statute does not make every out-of-court statement admissible or eliminate foundational requirements. The officer must meet the statutory training or experience qualifications, and the hearsay must be based on statements made by a declarant who is available for cross-examination at trial or otherwise satisfy the applicable statutory conditions. Defense counsel can challenge whether the officer is qualified, whether the testimony accurately conveys the source statement, whether the assertion is being offered beyond the scope of the statute, and whether the People have established the necessary foundation. Excluding or narrowing hearsay may reveal that the prosecution lacks competent proof on a critical element.
NHTSA SFST
Litigate Search, Seizure, and Statements Early
When the case depends on drugs, weapons, digital evidence, a vehicle search, a detention, or a confession, the defense can seek a suppression hearing under Penal Code § 1538.5. In felony cases, the preliminary hearing is commonly the procedural setting for litigating the motion, subject to statutory timing and local court practice. The issue may be whether officers had reasonable suspicion for a detention, probable cause for an arrest, a valid warrant, voluntary consent, a lawful probation-search condition, or a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. A Miranda or voluntariness issue may also undermine a statement. If vital evidence is suppressed, the prosecutor may be unable to establish probable cause, substantially changing the case before an information is filed.
VC §23152
Oppose Unsupported Counts and Enhancements
The complaint may allege multiple offenses, prior-conviction allegations, firearm or great-bodily-injury enhancements, gang-related allegations, or special circumstances. Each allegation has its own legal requirements and cannot be sustained merely because the core charge has some support. The defense should force the prosecution to identify evidence connecting the defendant to each count and enhancement, including the required mental state and factual nexus. For example, an enhancement may require personal use, personal infliction, knowledge, or a specific relationship to the charged offense. Removing an unsupported allegation at the preliminary hearing reduces exposure and can prevent an inflated information from driving bail, settlement discussions, and later litigation. A partial dismissal is a meaningful result even if another count proceeds.
17 CCR §1219.1
Use the Hearing to Shape Resolution and Later Review
The preliminary hearing can clarify what the District Attorney can actually prove, identify witnesses who are unavailable or reluctant, and expose weaknesses that were obscured in police reports. That information supports a targeted request for a reduced charge, dismissal of peripheral counts, a noncustodial disposition, or another legally available resolution. If the magistrate holds the defendant to answer despite a legal or evidentiary defect, the defense may seek review through a Penal Code § 995 motion to set aside the information after it is filed. Counsel must also protect the record with timely objections and precise arguments. The aim is not simply to “win the prelim”; it is to use this stage to narrow the case, preserve defenses, and improve the posture for all later proceedings.
VC §23103.5
Constitutional Sources: Fourth Amendment — U.S. Constitution
Questions
Frequently Asked — Preliminary Hearing California
What does the prosecutor have to prove at a California preliminary hearing?
The prosecutor does not have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a preliminary hearing. Under Penal Code § 872(a), the magistrate decides whether there is sufficient cause to believe a public offense has been committed and that the defendant is guilty of it. California courts describe this as a probable-cause or “strong suspicion” standard. The People must still present evidence supporting each essential element of each charged felony and any allegation they seek to sustain. A judge may dismiss a count that rests on speculation or lacks evidence of identity, intent, possession, causation, or another required fact. The lower standard makes dismissal harder than at trial, but it does not permit the prosecution to proceed on an unsupported accusation.
Can hearsay be used against me at my preliminary hearing?
Yes, but California has a specific statutory rule. Penal Code § 872(b) allows a qualified law-enforcement officer to testify to hearsay at a felony preliminary hearing in circumstances authorized by the statute. This is often called Proposition 115 hearsay. It means an officer may sometimes recount statements from a victim, witness, or other declarant rather than requiring that person to testify at the hearing. It does not mean hearsay is automatically admissible or that the defense has no challenge. Counsel can question the officer’s statutory qualifications, the foundation for the testimony, the accuracy and scope of the statement, and whether the People are relying on hearsay beyond what § 872(b) permits. Civilian testimony may still be strategically important in contested cases.
How soon must my preliminary hearing happen if I am in custody?
Penal Code § 859b generally gives a defendant in custody the right to a preliminary examination within 10 court days after arraignment or plea. A defendant who is not in custody generally has a right to the hearing within 60 calendar days after arraignment or plea. The time rules have exceptions: a defendant may personally waive time, and the court may continue the matter upon a showing of good cause under the statute. The calculation can be affected by intervening proceedings, unavailable witnesses, discovery issues, and defense-requested continuances. A missed statutory deadline does not automatically end every case in the same way, so counsel must assess the record, any waiver, the reason for delay, and the available remedy promptly.
Can the judge dismiss my felony charges at the preliminary hearing?
Yes. If the magistrate finds the prosecution has not shown sufficient cause to believe the defendant committed a charged offense, Penal Code § 872(a) requires dismissal rather than bindover on that allegation. The court may dismiss all charges, dismiss selected counts, or decline to hold the defendant to answer on particular enhancements or allegations. A dismissal at this stage is important, but it is not always the final word. Depending on the reason for dismissal and procedural posture, the prosecution may be able to refile charges, seek a new complaint, or pursue another authorized route. The defense therefore evaluates both the immediate dismissal argument and the factual record needed to deter or defeat any attempted refiling.
What happens after I am held to answer at a preliminary hearing?
If the magistrate holds you to answer, the prosecutor generally files an information in the superior court under Penal Code § 739. You are then arraigned on the information, usually enter a plea, and the case proceeds through discovery, motions, settlement discussions, and trial preparation. The information may not charge an offense not shown by the evidence taken at the preliminary hearing, subject to the governing law and procedural rules. The defense may challenge the bindover by filing a motion to set aside the information under Penal Code § 995, arguing that the defendant was committed without reasonable or probable cause or was denied a substantial right at the preliminary hearing. A successful § 995 motion can dismiss all or part of the information.
Do I have to testify at my California preliminary hearing?
No. You have a constitutional right not to testify, and the prosecutor cannot require you to take the stand at a preliminary hearing. In most cases, the defense does not call the defendant because sworn testimony can create impeachment material, disclose trial strategy, and give the prosecution advance notice of defenses. There are exceptions: testimony may be useful where it establishes a clear affirmative defense, corrects a crucial factual issue, or supports a suppression argument. That decision should be made only after reviewing reports, discovery, the charge elements, and the likely prosecution evidence. For a case-specific assessment of whether to testify, waive time, litigate suppression, or proceed with the hearing in Los Angeles County, contact Rubin Law, P.C. at (213) 723-2337.
Available 24/7 — Free Consultation
Charged with Preliminary Hearing California? Call Rubin Law Now.
Daniel S. Rubin defends clients facing criminal defense process charges throughout Los Angeles County. Your first consultation is free and confidential.