(213) 723-2337Free Consultation
PCPenal CodeWobbler

California Penal Code §136.1Intimidating a Witness

PC §136.1 punishes knowingly and maliciously preventing — or attempting to prevent or dissuade — any witness or victim from attending or testifying at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law, or from reporting a crime, or from cooperating with law enforcement or prosecutors. §136.1 is a wobbler when done without force or threat, and a straight felony when accompanied by force, threat of violence, or an underlying gang / co-defendant / organized-crime nexus (subd. (c)). Felony §136.1(c) is a serious felony strike under PC §1192.7(c)(37).

Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney · Intimidating a Witness Cases in All LA County Courts

01 — Quick Facts

PC §136.1 — Intimidating a Witness at a Glance

FactDetail
Full NameCalifornia Penal Code §136.1 — Intimidation of Witnesses and Victims
Code TypePenal Code (PC)
ClassificationWobbler (a)-(b); Straight Felony (c)
Penalty (Misd.)Up to 1 year county jail
Penalty (Felony)16 months, 2, or 3 years prison
Penalty (§136.1(c) force / gang)2, 3, or 4 years prison — STRIKE
Strike (subd. (c))YES — serious felony under §1192.7(c)(37)
Moral TurpitudeYes — categorical CIMT
ProbationAvailable except where subd. (c)(1) with GBI
ImmigrationAggravated felony if 1+ year imposed — 8 USC §1101(a)(43)(S)
Free Consultation(213) 723-2337 — 24/7

01 — What Is PC §136.1?

What Is California Penal Code §136.1?

PC §136.1 Reads:

"Except as provided in subdivision (c), every person who does any of the following is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison: (1) Knowingly and maliciously prevents or dissuades any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law. (2) Knowingly and maliciously attempts to prevent or dissuade any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law."

California Penal Code §136.1(a)–(b)

PC §136.1 is California's principal witness- and victim-intimidation statute. It reaches (a) knowingly preventing or dissuading a witness or victim from testifying; (b) knowingly preventing or dissuading a witness or victim from reporting a crime, aiding prosecution, or assisting the arrest process; and (c) any of the foregoing when accomplished by force, threat of force, in furtherance of a conspiracy, or for pecuniary gain / on behalf of a criminal street gang. Subd. (c) is a straight felony and a strike.

§136.1 Structure

§136.1(a) = testimony intimidation. §136.1(b) = reporting / cooperation intimidation. §136.1(c) = aggravated — force, threats, conspiracy, gang, or pecuniary gain. Subds. (a) and (b) are wobblers; subd. (c) is a strike-level felony.

§136.1(a)–(b) — Basic

Wobbler. Up to 1 year jail (misdemeanor) or 16 mo / 2 / 3 years prison (felony). No strike.

§136.1(c) — Aggravated

Straight felony. 2, 3, or 4 years prison. STRIKE (serious felony §1192.7(c)(37)).

Why §136.1 Matters

§136.1(c) is one of the most frequently charged strike offenses in California. A single threatening phone call or social-media post about testifying can support a strike-level filing. §136.1 convictions permanently affect firearms rights, immigration status (aggravated felony if 1+ year imposed), professional licensure, and family-court custody. §136.1(c) is also excluded from PC §1170(h) — it must be served in state prison, not county jail.

02 — Elements of the Crime

Elements the Prosecution Must Prove Under PC §136.1

To convict under PC §136.1, the prosecution must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

01

Knowing Conduct

The defendant must have acted knowingly — with awareness of the witness's / victim's status and the effect of the conduct.

Defense angle: Did the defendant know the person was a witness / victim? Was the communication understood as intimidation, or ordinary family / community expression?
02

Malicious Intent

The defendant must have acted maliciously — with the specific intent to annoy, injure, or interfere with a proceeding.

Defense angle: Was the intent to prevent testimony, or a lawful purpose (asserting factual innocence, urging honesty, requesting a meeting with counsel)?
03

Witness / Victim / Reporter

The target must have been a witness, victim, or person aiding law enforcement.

Defense angle: Was the target actually a witness / victim, or an intermediary or family member outside the statute's reach?
04

Prevent / Dissuade (or Attempt)

The conduct must have prevented, dissuaded, or attempted to prevent or dissuade.

Defense angle: Was there any communication of an intent to interfere, or ordinary conversation about the case?
05

Aggravating Circumstance (subd. (c) only)

For subd. (c), the prosecution must additionally prove force, threat of force, conspiracy, gang nexus, or pecuniary gain.

Defense angle: Was there actual threat or force? Was gang enhancement supported by STEP-Act evidence?

04 — Penalties

Penalties for PC §136.1 Intimidating a Witness in California

PC §136.1 penalties are as follows.

ChargeCodePrison TermProbationStrike
§136.1(a) Testimony IntimidationPC §136.1(a)Up to 1 year jail OR 16 mo/2/3 yrs prison (wobbler)AvailableNo
§136.1(b) Reporting IntimidationPC §136.1(b)Up to 1 year jail OR 16 mo/2/3 yrs prison (wobbler)AvailableNo
§136.1(c) AggravatedPC §136.1(c)2, 3, or 4 years state prisonAvailable (except with GBI)YES — §1192.7(c)(37)
FinePC §136.1 / §672Up to $10,000Additional to custodyN/A

Related Charges Frequently Filed with §136.1

PC §422

PC §422

Criminal threats — routinely charged in parallel when the intimidation included an explicit threat of death or GBI.

PC §186.22

PC §186.22

STEP Act gang enhancement — 2, 3, or 4 years added when §136.1(c) done for the benefit of a criminal street gang.

PC §182

PC §182

Conspiracy — charged where multiple defendants coordinated the intimidation.

PC §12022.7

PC §12022.7

GBI enhancement — 3–6 years where the intimidation caused GBI.

Beyond the Sentence

  • Serious-felony strike prior on §136.1(c) — Three Strikes exposure
  • Excluded from PC §1170(h) county-jail felony sentencing — mandatory state prison
  • Aggravated felony for immigration if 1+ year imposed (obstruction-of-justice under 8 USC §1101(a)(43)(S))
  • 10-year firearms prohibition under PC §29805 for misdemeanor; lifetime under PC §29800 for felony
  • Family-court custody / visitation restrictions
  • Protective orders under PC §136.2 — automatic on filing

05 — Defense Strategies

How Rubin Law Defends PC §136.1 Intimidating a Witness Charges

Rubin Law, P.C. attacks the elements of PC §136.1 and mitigates strike exposure.

No Malicious Intent

§136.1 requires specific malicious intent to interfere. Ordinary conversations, requests to tell the truth, apologies, and settlement discussions do not satisfy the element.

PC §136.1 malice

First Amendment / Family Expression

Family members' emotional expressions about the case — 'why are you doing this to your brother' — are constitutionally protected speech absent an unambiguous threat.

1st Amendment

No Threat (reduce from (c) to (a)/(b))

Where the conduct lacked force, threat, gang nexus, or pecuniary gain, the felony reduces from the strike-level (c) to the wobbler (a) or (b) — eliminating strike exposure.

§136.1(a)/(b)

STEP-Act Enhancement Attack

Post-AB 333, PC §186.22 requires proof that the intimidation was committed 'with' and 'in association with' identified gang members and that it 'commonly benefits' the gang. Rubin Law defeats predicate-offense and benefit elements.

PC §186.22

Not a 'Witness'

The target must be a witness, victim, or cooperator. Family members and intermediaries fall outside the statute unless independently qualifying.

PC §136(2)

PC §17(b) Reduction

For wobbler (a) / (b) filings resolved by probation, Rubin Law obtains §17(b) reduction to misdemeanor after successful probation completion.

PC §17(b)

Romero Motion (strike dismissal)

Where a §136.1(c) strike allegation is filed against a first-time or minor-record defendant, Rubin Law files People v. Superior Court (Romero) motions to dismiss the strike in the interest of justice.

People v. Romero

07 — Court Process

How PC §136.1 Intimidating a Witness Cases Move Through Los Angeles Courts

§136.1 cases proceed through the following stages.

  1. 1

    Step 1Investigation

    Detectives interview the witness / victim, obtain jail-call recordings (§4570-authorized), social-media evidence, and phone records establishing the intimidation communications.

  2. 2

    Step 2Filing / Arraignment

    Filed in the courthouse handling the underlying case. PC §136.2 protective orders issue automatically at first appearance.

  3. 3

    Step 3Preliminary Hearing (felony)

    Prima-facie showing on knowledge, malice, and — for subd. (c) — the aggravating circumstance.

  4. 4

    Step 4Discovery

    Jail-call recordings, social-media forensics, cell-phone extractions (Cellebrite), and witness statements — plus STEP-Act discovery for any gang allegation.

  5. 5

    Step 5Pretrial Motions

    PC §995 dismissal on knowledge / malice sufficiency, §186.22 attacks on gang enhancement, Romero motions on strike dismissal, PC §17(b) reduction motions.

  6. 6

    Step 6Trial

    CALCRIM 2622 / 2623. Typically 3–7 court days. Extensive forensic-communications evidence.

  7. 7

    Step 7Sentencing

    Strike consequence on subd. (c) — Rubin Law argues Romero dismissal, low-term selection, and enhancement striking under PC §1385.

Reviewed by Your Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin — Los Angeles Intimidating a Witness Defense Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin has defended clients charged with intimidating a witness and related offenses in Los Angeles County courts — including Clara Shortridge Foltz, Van Nuys, Compton, and Pomona. He understands that these cases are won in the details: the suppression hearing that eliminates key evidence, the preliminary hearing cross-examination that exposes a weak witness, the penalty phase argument that keeps a client out of the worst outcome.

This page was written and reviewed by Daniel A. Rubin, Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, CA State Bar 302093, with 10+ years of experience defending clients charged under PC §136.1 in Los Angeles County. Last reviewed: July 2026.

CA Bar 302093 | Whittier Law School | Rising Star — Super Lawyers 2019–2023 | Intimidating a Witness Cases Throughout LA County

See our full Intimidating a Witness defense practice

09 — FAQs

PC §136.1 Intimidating a Witness Questions — Los Angeles

Is PC §136.1 a strike?

Only subd. (c) is a strike — the aggravated form involving force, threats, conspiracy, gang nexus, or pecuniary gain. §136.1(c) is a serious felony under PC §1192.7(c)(37). Subds. (a) and (b) are wobblers and are NOT strikes.

What is 'malicious' under §136.1?

PC §136 defines malice as any unlawful intent to vex, annoy, harm, or injure, or to thwart or interfere with the orderly administration of justice. Requests to tell the truth, apologies, and settlement discussions do not satisfy malice.

Can §136.1 be a felony without any force?

Yes. §136.1(a) and (b) are wobblers and may be charged as felonies (16 mo, 2, or 3 years) without force. §136.1(c) requires force, threat, gang nexus, conspiracy, or pecuniary gain.

Does a §136.2 protective order automatically issue?

Yes. PC §136.2 authorizes protective orders in any case involving witness / victim intimidation, and courts issue them routinely at the first appearance in a §136.1 filing.

Is §136.1 an aggravated felony for immigration?

Yes if 1 year or more is imposed. §136.1 is a categorical obstruction-of-justice offense — an aggravated felony under 8 USC §1101(a)(43)(S) when the sentence is 1 year or greater. Under-1-year sentences remain CIMTs.

Can §136.1(c) be reduced?

§136.1(c) is a straight felony and cannot be reduced under §17(b). However, Rubin Law negotiates plea reductions to §136.1(a) / (b) wobblers, and files Romero motions to dismiss the strike in cases proceeding to sentence.

Does a jail phone call to a family member count as intimidation?

It can. Jail calls are recorded and routinely used as §136.1 evidence. Even indirect messages to a witness through a family intermediary can qualify if the intent to prevent testimony is proven.

Available 24/7 — Free Consultation

Charged with Intimidating a Witness Under PC §136.1?

§136.1(c) is a strike-level felony with lifetime consequences. Rubin Law, P.C. attacks jail-call and social-media evidence, defeats STEP-Act enhancements, and files Romero motions on every strike allegation.