(213) 723-2337Free Consultation
PCPenal CodeWobbler

California Penal Code §192(c)Vehicular Manslaughter

PC §192(c) punishes an unlawful killing caused by driving without malice — a wobbler carrying up to 6 years state prison for a felony conviction or up to 1 year in county jail for a misdemeanor. Unlike §191.5, no intoxication is required.

Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney · Vehicular Manslaughter Cases in All LA County Courts

01 — Quick Facts

PC §192(c) — Vehicular Manslaughter at a Glance

FactDetail
Full NameCalifornia Penal Code §192(c) — Vehicular Manslaughter
Code TypePenal Code (PC)
ClassificationWobbler (Misdemeanor or Felony)
Structure§192(c)(1) Gross negligence / §192(c)(2) Ordinary negligence / §192(c)(3) Scheme to defraud
Felony §192(c)(1)2, 4, or 6 years state prison
Misdemeanor §192(c)(2)Up to 1 year county jail
StrikeNo (§191.5(a) and §187 are the strike variants)
ProbationAvailable in most §192(c) filings
LicenseMandatory DMV revocation on any §192(c) conviction (VC §13350)
Related CodesPC §191.5 (DUI-fatality), PC §187 (Watson murder), VC §23153 (DUI causing injury)
If ChargedCall (213) 723-2337 immediately

01 — What Is PC §192(c)?

What Is California Penal Code §192(c)?

PC §192(c) Reads:

"Vehicular manslaughter means driving a vehicle in the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, and with gross negligence; or driving a vehicle in the commission of a lawful act which might produce death, in an unlawful manner, and with gross negligence."

California Penal Code §192(c)(1)

California Penal Code §192(c) is the vehicle-caused branch of the manslaughter statute. It covers driving that kills — without intoxication (which is punished separately under PC §191.5) and without malice (which is punished under PC §187 Watson murder). The prosecution's theory turns on whether the driving was grossly negligent, ordinarily negligent, or executed as part of a scheme to defraud an insurer.

Three Tiers of §192(c)

§192(c)(1) is felony gross-negligence vehicular manslaughter — 2, 4, or 6 years state prison. §192(c)(2) is misdemeanor ordinary-negligence vehicular manslaughter — up to 1 year jail. §192(c)(3) covers killings in the commission of an insurance-fraud vehicle scheme — punishable as a felony under §193(c)(3).

Why the Tier Matters

The line between §192(c)(1) and §192(c)(2) is the line between prison and jail. Gross negligence is a legal conclusion — accident-reconstruction expertise, prior-driving history, and moment-of-decision analysis all move the case across that line.

02 — Elements of the Crime

Elements the Prosecution Must Prove Under PC §192(c)

The prosecution must prove the driving conduct, the death, causation, and the applicable mens rea (gross vs ordinary negligence).

01

Driving a Vehicle

Defendant was driving a motor vehicle at the time of the fatal act.

Defense angle: Identity — was the defendant the driver? Passenger-swap and eyewitness misidentification are recurring §192(c) defenses.
02

Unlawful Act or Negligent Manner

Defendant either committed an unlawful act not amounting to a felony (e.g. VC infraction), or performed a lawful act in a negligent manner.

Defense angle: Underlying act was neither unlawful nor negligent.
03

Gross or Ordinary Negligence

Under §192(c)(1) the state must prove gross negligence — a gross deviation from the reasonable-driver standard. §192(c)(2) requires only ordinary negligence.

Defense angle: Accident-reconstruction expert can recharacterize gross negligence as ordinary.
04

Death of Another

A human being (other than the defendant) was killed.

Defense angle: Not applicable to the fatality element itself, but rebuttal to cause of death is often available.
05

Causation

The defendant's driving was a substantial factor in causing the death.

Defense angle: Intervening or superseding causes — victim conduct, unbelted ejection, third-party impact, medical error.

04 — Penalties

Penalties for PC §192(c) Vehicular Manslaughter in California

§193(c) sets the triads; §1170(h) governs the custody location.

ChargeCodePrison TermProbationStrike
§192(c)(1) Gross-Negligence Vehicular ManslaughterPC §193(c)(1)2, 4, or 6 years state prisonAvailableNo
§192(c)(2) Ordinary-Negligence Vehicular ManslaughterPC §193(c)(2)Up to 1 year county jailAvailableNo
§192(c)(3) Insurance-Fraud Vehicular HomicidePC §193(c)(3)4, 6, or 10 years state prisonPresumptively deniedNo

Sentencing Enhancements

Fleeing the Scene

PC §20001(c)

+5 years consecutive where defendant flees the scene of the §192(c) killing.

GBI to a Non-Fatal Victim

PC §12022.7

+3 years for GBI inflicted on an additional non-fatal victim.

Multiple Victims

PC §1170.1

Consecutive triads for each additional deceased victim.

Additional Consequences Beyond Prison

  • Mandatory DMV license revocation under VC §13350
  • Immigration: CIMT — deportability and inadmissibility exposure
  • Felony conviction bars firearm possession (PC §29800)
  • Civil wrongful-death lawsuit is standard

05 — Defense Strategies

How Rubin Law Defends PC §192(c) Vehicular Manslaughter Charges

§192(c) cases are won on causation, mens rea, and identity — the same defense architecture as PC §187 without the malice fight.

No Gross Negligence

Accident-reconstruction and human-factors experts recharacterize the driving as ordinary negligence — collapsing §192(c)(1) into §192(c)(2).

PC §192(c)

Superseding Causation

Victim's own driving, third-party impact, or medical negligence broke the causal chain.

PC §192(c)

Sudden Emergency

CALCRIM 590 — a driver confronted with an emergency not of their own making is judged by the emergency standard, not the reasonable-driver standard.

CALCRIM 590

Identity

Passenger swap, single-vehicle rollover, or unclear witness identification of the driver.

Identity

07 — Court Process

How PC §192(c) Vehicular Manslaughter Cases Move Through Los Angeles Courts

§192(c) prosecutions follow the standard California felony track; the fights are causation, mens rea, and prior driving history.

  1. 1

    Step 1Investigation

    CHP MAIT team accident reconstruction, toxicology, and scene diagramming.

  2. 2

    Step 2Filing Decision

    DA elects §192(c)(1) felony vs §192(c)(2) misdemeanor based on gross-negligence analysis.

  3. 3

    Step 3Arraignment

    Bail set — substantial on §192(c)(1) filings, OR possible on §192(c)(2).

  4. 4

    Step 4Preliminary Hearing (PC §872)

    Reconstruction expert testimony often first surfaces here; PC §17(b) reduction motions frequently follow.

  5. 5

    Step 5Motions

    PC §995 sufficiency motions; PC §1538.5 suppression of scene statements and toxicology.

  6. 6

    Step 6Trial or Plea

    Trial centers on gross-vs-ordinary negligence; pleas frequently negotiate §192(c)(1) down to §192(c)(2).

  7. 7

    Step 7Sentencing

    Mitigation hearing under PC §1170(b) — driving history, victim-family input, and rehabilitation record all weigh.

Reviewed by Your Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin — Los Angeles Vehicular Manslaughter Defense Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin has defended clients charged with vehicular manslaughter and related offenses in Los Angeles County courts — including Clara Shortridge Foltz, Van Nuys, Compton, and Pomona. He understands that these cases are won in the details: the suppression hearing that eliminates key evidence, the preliminary hearing cross-examination that exposes a weak witness, the penalty phase argument that keeps a client out of the worst outcome.

This page was written and reviewed by Daniel A. Rubin, Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, CA State Bar 302093, with 10+ years of experience defending clients charged under PC §192(c) in Los Angeles County. Last reviewed: July 2026.

CA Bar 302093 | Whittier Law School | Rising Star — Super Lawyers 2019–2023 | Vehicular Manslaughter Cases Throughout LA County

See our full Vehicular Manslaughter defense practice

09 — FAQs

PC §192(c) Vehicular Manslaughter Questions — Los Angeles

What is PC §192(c)?

California's vehicular-manslaughter statute — an unlawful killing caused by driving, without malice and without intoxication.

Is §192(c) a strike?

No. The strike variants are PC §191.5(a) (gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated) and PC §187 (Watson murder).

Can §192(c) be reduced to a misdemeanor?

Yes — §192(c)(1) can be reduced to §192(c)(2) by plea or PC §17(b) motion in appropriate cases.

Will I lose my license?

Yes — DMV revokes the license of any §192(c) defendant under VC §13350.

Available 24/7 — Free Consultation

Charged With PC §192(c) in Los Angeles?

Rubin Law, P.C. defends vehicular-manslaughter cases across every LA County courthouse. Call (213) 723-2337.