(213) 723-2337Free Consultation
PCPenal CodeMisdemeanor

California Penal Code §303aLoitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol

PC §303a makes it a misdemeanor for any person to loiter in or about any premises licensed for on-sale alcohol consumption for the purpose of begging or soliciting any patron or customer of, or visitor in, the licensed premises to purchase any alcoholic beverage for the person loitering. Exposure is up to 6 months county jail and a $1,000 fine. §303a is the 'B-girl' statute, historically enacted to combat solicitation practices in bars where employees would solicit patrons to buy drinks — often on a commission basis (the sister-statute §303 addresses the commission arrangement itself).

Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney · Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol Cases in All LA County Courts

01 — Quick Facts

PC §303a — Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol at a Glance

FactDetail
Full NameCalifornia Penal Code §303a — Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol
Code TypePenal Code (PC)
ClassificationMisdemeanor
PenaltyUp to 6 months county jail + $1,000 fine
CategoryPublic Order
ProbationCase-specific — see penalties section
StrikeSee penalties table
ExpungeableSee defense analysis
ImmigrationConsult immigration counsel — case-specific
Free Consultation(213) 723-2337 — 24/7

01 — What Is PC §303a?

What Is California Penal Code §303a?

PC §303a Reads:

"It shall be unlawful, in any establishment where alcoholic beverages are sold for consumption on the premises, for any person to loiter in or about the premises for the purpose of begging or soliciting any patron or customer of, or visitor in, the premises to purchase any alcoholic beverage for the person begging or soliciting."

California Penal Code §303a

PC §303a addresses a historically specific commercial practice: bar employees ('B-girls') who solicit customers to buy them drinks, often on a hidden commission arrangement with the licensee. The sister statute PC §303 makes it unlawful for the licensee to pay a commission based on drink sales. Modern §303a filings are rare but occur in ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control) investigations and vice-related operations. The statute reaches the loitering-for-solicitation conduct itself, not the customer.

Why This Law Matters

§303a is a misdemeanor with modest exposure but has ABC-licensing implications for the venue and employment consequences for the defendant. The statute is narrowly drafted and is frequently defeated by attacking the loitering purpose or the on-sale licensing element. ABC administrative proceedings frequently parallel criminal filings — Rubin Law coordinates defense across both venues.

02 — Elements of the Crime

Elements the Prosecution Must Prove Under PC §303a

The People must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

01

Loitering In or About On-Sale Licensed Premises

The venue must be licensed for on-sale alcohol consumption (Type 40, 41, 42, 47, 48, etc. under ABC).

Defense angle: Challenge: off-sale premises (Type 20, 21) and unlicensed venues fall outside §303a.
02

Purpose Was to Beg or Solicit Alcohol Purchase

The People must prove specific intent — loitering with the purpose of soliciting.

Defense angle: Challenge: general socializing, dating, and non-commission-based interactions defeat the purpose element.
03

Solicitation Directed at Patron, Customer, or Visitor

The target must be a patron/customer/visitor — not an employee or another loiterer.

Defense angle: Challenge: interactions between employees or between fellow loiterers do not qualify.
04

Purpose Was Alcohol Purchase for the Person Loitering

The alcohol purchased must have been for the person soliciting — not a third party.

Defense angle: Challenge: buying drinks for a table, a group, or a third party defeats the specific-benefit element.

04 — Penalties

Penalties for PC §303a Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol in California

Penalty structure and enhancements for this offense.

ChargeCodePrison TermProbationStrike
§303a MisdemeanorPC §303aUp to 6 months county jail + $1,000 fineSummary — up to 3 yearsNo
Companion §303 Licensee CommissionPC §303Same range plus ABC administrative actionN/ANo
Judicial Diversion (§1001.95)PC §1001.95None — case dismissed on successful completionDiversion programNo

Related Enhancements & Charges

Companion PC §303 Commission Arrangement

PC §303

Licensee-side commission payment; ABC-license impact.

Companion PC §647(b) Prostitution

PC §647(b)

Co-filed where solicitation extended to sexual services.

Companion PC §266h Pimping

PC §266h

Escalation where commercial-sex arrangement alleged.

ABC Bus. & Prof. §25601

B&P §25601

Administrative-license action against the venue.

Beyond the Sentence

  • ABC-license consequences for the employing venue
  • Employment consequences in the hospitality industry
  • Companion §647(b) or §266h counts in vice-operation cases
  • Immigration consequences — case-specific CIMT analysis
  • Civil-recovery liability under B&P §17200 where deceptive commission alleged
  • Vice-operation investigations frequently expand into wider prosecution

05 — Defense Strategies

How Rubin Law Defends PC §303a Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol Charges

Rubin Law, P.C. defends this offense through the following strategies.

Not On-Sale Licensed Premises

Off-sale venues (Type 20/21), private events, and unlicensed venues fall outside §303a. Rubin Law verifies ABC licensing status.

ABC Licensing Element

No Solicitation Purpose

General socializing, dating, and non-commercial interactions defeat the purpose element. The People must prove specific intent to solicit — not merely be present.

PC §21a Intent

No Commission or Financial Arrangement

Where no commission or financial arrangement with the licensee exists, the statute's purpose is not implicated. Absence of a commission agreement is a strong mitigating factor.

Purpose Element

Interaction With Employees Only

Solicitation directed at fellow employees rather than patrons defeats the customer-target element.

Target Element

Judicial Diversion (§1001.95)

§303a qualifies for §1001.95 judicial diversion — successful completion results in dismissal.

PC §1001.95

Entrapment (ABC Sting Operations)

ABC sting operations often involve pressured solicitation by undercover investigators. Objective entrapment defense under People v. Barraza applies.

People v. Barraza

07 — Court Process

How PC §303a Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol Cases Move Through Los Angeles Courts

Typical case flow through the LA County courts.

  1. 1

    Step 1ABC Investigation

    Most §303a cases originate from ABC compliance operations, undercover stings, or license-renewal audits. Do not speak with ABC investigators without counsel.

  2. 2

    Step 2Filing / Arraignment

    Misdemeanor filed in the local courthouse. §1001.95 diversion eligibility discussed at arraignment.

  3. 3

    Step 3Discovery

    ABC investigation reports, undercover officer notes, video/audio recordings, and licensee commission records.

  4. 4

    Step 4Motion Practice

    §1001.95 diversion motions, entrapment litigation, and Pitchess motions on ABC investigators.

  5. 5

    Step 5Trial or Diversion

    Most §303a cases resolve through §1001.95 diversion. Trial defense focuses on the purpose and target elements.

  6. 6

    Step 6Sentencing / Diversion Completion

    Successful diversion — case dismissed. Otherwise: summary probation, community service.

Reviewed by Your Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin — Los Angeles Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol Defense Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin has defended clients charged with loitering to solicit purchase of alcohol and related offenses in Los Angeles County courts — including Clara Shortridge Foltz, Van Nuys, Compton, and Pomona. He understands that these cases are won in the details: the suppression hearing that eliminates key evidence, the preliminary hearing cross-examination that exposes a weak witness, the penalty phase argument that keeps a client out of the worst outcome.

This page was written and reviewed by Daniel A. Rubin, Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, CA State Bar 302093, with 10+ years of experience defending clients charged under PC §303a in Los Angeles County. Last reviewed: July 2026.

CA Bar 302093 | Whittier Law School | Rising Star — Super Lawyers 2019–2023 | Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol Cases Throughout LA County

See our full Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol defense practice

09 — FAQs

PC §303a Loitering to Solicit Purchase of Alcohol Questions — Los Angeles

What is PC §303a?

PC §303a makes it a misdemeanor to loiter in or about a bar or on-sale licensed premises for the purpose of soliciting a patron to buy the loiterer an alcoholic beverage. Exposure is up to 6 months county jail and a $1,000 fine.

What is the difference between §303 and §303a?

PC §303 prohibits licensee payment of commissions to employees based on drink sales. PC §303a prohibits loitering to solicit patrons to buy drinks for the loiterer. §303 targets the licensee arrangement; §303a targets the loitering conduct.

Does §303a apply to all bars?

Only to on-sale licensed premises (ABC Type 40, 41, 42, 47, 48, etc.). Off-sale venues (Type 20, 21) and unlicensed venues fall outside §303a.

Is §303a a common charge?

No. Modern §303a filings are rare but occur in ABC compliance operations, vice-related sting operations, and license-renewal audits.

Is §303a eligible for diversion?

Yes. §303a is a non-violent misdemeanor eligible for §1001.95 judicial diversion — successful completion results in dismissal.

Will §303a affect my hospitality-industry employment?

It can. The employer's ABC license may be affected, and background checks in the hospitality industry frequently identify §303a. Rubin Law negotiates dismissal outcomes to preserve employability.

Does §303a target the customer?

No. §303a targets the person loitering to solicit — usually a bar employee or associate. The customer who buys the drink is not criminalized.

Available 24/7 — Free Consultation

Charged with PC §303a Loitering to Solicit Alcohol? Call Rubin Law.

§303a is a specific vice-adjacent misdemeanor with ABC-license and employment consequences. Rubin Law, P.C. defends by attacking the purpose element, litigating entrapment, and pushing for §1001.95 diversion. Call (213) 723-2337.