(213) 723-2337Free Consultation
PCPenal CodeMisdemeanor

California Penal Code §459.5Shoplifting

PC §459.5 defines shoplifting — created by Prop 47 (2014) — as entering a commercial establishment during business hours with intent to commit larceny of property valued at $950 or less. It is a misdemeanor (not a burglary) and carries up to 6 months in county jail.

Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney · Shoplifting Cases in All LA County Courts

01 — Quick Facts

PC §459.5 — Shoplifting at a Glance

FactDetail
Full NameCalifornia Penal Code §459.5 — Shoplifting
Code TypePenal Code (PC)
ClassificationMisdemeanor
Jail TermUp to 6 months county jail
FineUp to $1,000
Value Threshold$950 or less
vs Commercial BurglaryPC §459 requires ≥$950 loss OR closed hours OR non-larceny intent
Prop 47 OriginReduced most theft-based commercial burglaries to misdemeanor
DiversionPC §1001.95 judicial diversion available
Prior-Serious-Felony ExceptionPersons with prior 'super strike' convictions still charged as felony §459
ImmigrationTheft-based CIMT — mitigation critical
If ChargedCall (213) 723-2337 immediately

01 — What Is PC §459.5?

What Is California Penal Code §459.5?

PC §459.5 Reads:

"Shoplifting is defined as entering a commercial establishment with intent to commit larceny while that establishment is open during regular business hours, where the value of the property that is taken or intended to be taken does not exceed nine hundred fifty dollars ($950). Any other entry into a commercial establishment with intent to commit larceny is burglary."

California Penal Code §459.5(a)

Before Prop 47, walking into a store to steal was often filed as commercial burglary under §459 — a wobbler carrying up to 3 years. Prop 47 carved out §459.5 to force a misdemeanor filing where the intended loss is $950 or less, the store is open, and the intent is theft (not another felony). Defendants with prior 'super strike' or sex-offender registerable convictions remain eligible for felony §459 filing.

§459.5 vs §459 Commercial Burglary

§459.5 is the mandatory filing when the three thresholds are met: open hours + intent to steal + ≤$950. If the entry occurred while closed, or the intent was to commit a different felony (identity theft, check fraud), or the value exceeded $950, prosecutors may charge §459 second-degree commercial burglary instead.

02 — Elements of the Crime

Elements the Prosecution Must Prove Under PC §459.5

Under CALCRIM 1703, the prosecution must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

01

Entry Into Commercial Establishment

Defendant entered a commercial establishment.

Defense angle: Storage areas, employee-only zones, and non-commercial premises may not qualify.
02

Intent to Commit Larceny at Entry

At the moment of entry, defendant intended to commit theft.

Defense angle: Intent formed after entry is not shoplifting — case drops to §484 petty theft.
03

Open During Business Hours

The establishment was open for business at the time of entry.

Defense angle: After-hours entry is §459 burglary, not §459.5 — filing challenge only, not defense.
04

Value ≤ $950

Property taken or intended to be taken was worth $950 or less.

Defense angle: Ticket price disputes and aggregation-of-value challenges may reduce or defeat the count.

04 — Penalties

Penalties for PC §459.5 Shoplifting in California

§459.5 is a Prop 47 misdemeanor with substantial diversion and reduction pathways.

ChargeCodePrison TermProbationStrike
ShopliftingPC §459.5Up to 6 months county jailAvailable; §1001.95 diversion primaryNo
Second-Degree Commercial Burglary (comparison)PC §459Up to 3 years (16m/2/3) as felonyAvailableNo
Petty Theft (comparison)PC §484 / §490.2Up to 6 months jailAvailableNo

Sentencing Enhancements

Prior 'Super Strike'

PC §667(e)(2)(C)(iv) / §290 registrant

Defendants with a prior murder, forcible sex offense, or §290-registerable offense may be charged as felony §459 despite Prop 47.

Organized Retail Theft

PC §490.4

Multiple §459.5 acts across ≥2 counties totalling >$950 in 12 months can be aggregated to felony §490.4.

Civil Demand

PC §490.5

Merchants can recover $50–$500 civil penalty separate from criminal case.

Additional Consequences Beyond Prison

  • Automatic §1001.95 diversion eligibility on first-time filings
  • Immigration: theft-based CIMT — potential inadmissibility even on misdemeanor
  • Retail-store lifetime trespass bar (Prop 47 conviction) — separate §602 exposure on re-entry
  • Professional license impact — DRE, Bar, nursing, financial services
  • Employment background-check impact

05 — Defense Strategies

How Rubin Law Defends PC §459.5 Shoplifting Charges

§459.5 defenses attack intent-at-entry, value, and commercial-establishment element.

PC §1001.95 Judicial Diversion

First-time §459.5 filings are eligible for judicial diversion — dismissal on completion of terms.

§1001.95

Intent Formed After Entry

Where the intent to steal was formed after entering the store, the case drops to petty theft (§484/§490.2) — no burglary at all.

Timing

Value Contest

MSRP overstatements, aggregation disputes, and returns push value below $950.

Value

No Concealment / No Taking

Where defendant did not conceal or leave the store with the item, intent to permanently deprive is contestable.

Element

Prop 47 §1170.18 Reduction

Pre-2014 felony commercial burglary convictions for shoplifting conduct can be reduced to §459.5 misdemeanor petitions.

§1170.18

07 — Court Process

How PC §459.5 Shoplifting Cases Move Through Los Angeles Courts

§459.5 cases move quickly and are frequently diverted.

  1. 1

    Step 1Detention & Cite-Out

    Loss-prevention officer detains, PD cites out. Physical arrest is rare.

  2. 2

    Step 2Arraignment

    Not-guilty plea; discovery scheduled.

  3. 3

    Step 3Loss-Prevention Discovery

    Store CCTV, incident reports, and civil-demand letters obtained.

  4. 4

    Step 4§1001.95 Motion

    Judicial diversion motion filed at pretrial.

  5. 5

    Step 5Diversion / Plea / Trial

    Most first-time §459.5 filings resolve via diversion and dismissal.

Reviewed by Your Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin — Los Angeles Shoplifting Defense Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin has defended clients charged with shoplifting and related offenses in Los Angeles County courts — including Clara Shortridge Foltz, Van Nuys, Compton, and Pomona. He understands that these cases are won in the details: the suppression hearing that eliminates key evidence, the preliminary hearing cross-examination that exposes a weak witness, the penalty phase argument that keeps a client out of the worst outcome.

This page was written and reviewed by Daniel A. Rubin, Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, CA State Bar 302093, with 10+ years of experience defending clients charged under PC §459.5 in Los Angeles County. Last reviewed: July 2026.

CA Bar 302093 | Whittier Law School | Rising Star — Super Lawyers 2019–2023 | Shoplifting Cases Throughout LA County

See our full Shoplifting defense practice

09 — FAQs

PC §459.5 Shoplifting Questions — Los Angeles

Is PC §459.5 the same as burglary?

No. Prop 47 (2014) carved shoplifting out of the burglary statute. §459.5 is a misdemeanor. §459 burglary is a wobbler.

What if I was charged with §459 for shoplifting conduct?

Where the entry was during open hours with intent to steal ≤$950, the charge must be §459.5. A §459 filing is subject to Prop 47 reduction under §1170.18.

Can §459.5 be dismissed?

Yes. PC §1001.95 judicial misdemeanor diversion allows dismissal on completion of court-set terms — a top outcome for first-time filings.

Will the store sue me too?

The store can demand a civil penalty of $50–$500 under §490.5. That civil action is separate from the criminal case.

Available 24/7 — Free Consultation

Charged With PC §459.5 in Los Angeles?

Prop 47 shoplifting defense with §1001.95 diversion and CIMT-aware mitigation. Rubin Law, P.C. — (213) 723-2337.