(213) 723-2337Free Consultation
PCPenal CodeWobbler

California Penal Code §496Receiving Stolen Property

PC §496(a) punishes anyone who buys, receives, conceals, sells, or withholds property they know to be stolen. Under Prop 47, if the property's value is $950 or less, the offense is a misdemeanor. Above $950 it is a wobbler carrying up to 1 year jail (misdemeanor) or 16 months, 2, or 3 years (felony). §496(d) governs stolen vehicles as a straight wobbler regardless of value.

Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney · Receiving Stolen Property Cases in All LA County Courts

01 — Quick Facts

PC §496 — Receiving Stolen Property at a Glance

FactDetail
Full NameCalifornia Penal Code §496 — Receiving Stolen Property
Code TypePenal Code (PC)
ClassificationMisdemeanor (≤ $950) or Wobbler (> $950)
MisdemeanorUp to 1 year county jail; up to $1,000 fine
Felony16 months, 2, or 3 years county jail (§1170(h))
§496(d) Stolen VehicleWobbler regardless of value — up to 3 years
Civil Liability§496(c) — triple actual damages + attorney fees to victim
Knowledge RequirementActual or constructive knowledge property was stolen
Prop 47Value ≤ $950 → misdemeanor treatment mandatory absent enumerated priors
ImmigrationCIMT — deportable if sentence 1 year+
If ChargedCall (213) 723-2337 immediately

01 — What Is PC §496?

What Is California Penal Code §496?

PC §496 Reads:

"Every person who buys or receives any property that has been stolen or that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft or extortion, knowing the property to be so stolen or obtained, or who conceals, sells, withholds, or aids in concealing, selling, or withholding any property from the owner, knowing the property to be so stolen or obtained, shall be punished…"

California Penal Code §496(a)

§496 exists to punish the market for stolen goods. Prosecutors regularly file §496 as a companion count to theft — or as a standalone charge when defendant did not personally steal but knowingly received the property. The 'knowledge' element is the case's center of gravity.

§496(a) Property vs. §496(d) Vehicles

§496(a) covers property generally and is Prop 47-eligible (misdemeanor at ≤ $950). §496(d) is a discrete offense for receiving a stolen vehicle — always a wobbler, value threshold irrelevant. §496(d) is not affected by Prop 47.

02 — Elements of the Crime

Elements the Prosecution Must Prove Under PC §496

The prosecution must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt (CALCRIM 1750).

01

Property Was Stolen

The property was in fact obtained by theft, extortion, or fraud.

Defense angle: Property lawfully acquired — or property whose theft cannot be proved — defeats the charge.
02

Defendant Bought / Received / Concealed / Sold / Withheld It

Defendant took one of the enumerated actions with respect to the property.

Defense angle: Innocent handling, momentary possession, and joint occupancy of a location where property was found are all challengeable.
03

Knowledge It Was Stolen

Defendant knew (or under People v. Anderson, was aware of facts that would put a reasonable person on notice) the property was stolen when they received or handled it.

Defense angle: Good-faith purchase, misrepresentation by the seller, and lack of suspicious indicia (fair market price paid, receipt provided) attack knowledge.

04 — Penalties

Penalties for PC §496 Receiving Stolen Property in California

§496 penalty tier depends on the value of the property.

ChargeCodePrison TermProbationStrike
§496(a) — Property Value ≤ $950PC §496(a) (Prop 47)Up to 1 year county jail; up to $1,000 fineAvailableNo
§496(a) — Property Value > $950PC §496(a)Wobbler — up to 1 yr jail or 16/2/3 county prisonAvailableNo
§496(d) — Stolen VehiclePC §496(d)Wobbler — up to 1 yr jail or 16/2/3 county prisonAvailableNo

Related Enhancements

Aggravated White-Collar Enhancement

PC §186.11

When receiving is part of a pattern of related felony fraud/theft conduct with loss > $100K, adds 1–5 years.

Excessive Takings

PC §186.11 or §12022.6 (repealed prospectively — see current §186.11)

Loss tiers stack additional prison time on aggregated theft/receiving conduct.

Civil Treble Damages

PC §496(c)

Victim may sue in civil court for THREE TIMES actual damages plus attorney fees, independent of criminal outcome (Siry Investment v. Farkhondehpour, 2022).

Additional Consequences Beyond Prison

  • Prop 47 reclassification available to reduce prior felony §496 to misdemeanor if value ≤ $950
  • PC §17(b) reduction to misdemeanor on §496(a) > $950 wobbler
  • Immigration: CIMT — deportable aggravated felony under 8 USC §1101(a)(43)(G) if sentence 1 year+
  • Restitution to victim under PC §1202.4
  • Firearm ban on any felony conviction

05 — Defense Strategies

How Rubin Law Defends PC §496 Receiving Stolen Property Charges

§496 defenses attack knowledge, possession, and stolen status.

Lack of Knowledge

The core defense — defendant did not know and had no reason to know the property was stolen. Fair market price paid, receipt provided, or plausible cover story from seller all rebut knowledge.

Mens Rea

Property Not Stolen

Prosecution must prove theft — a documented sale, gift, or abandonment breaks the chain.

Predicate

Innocent Possession

Momentary or transitory handling to return property or investigate is not §496 possession.

Momentary

Prop 47 Reduction

Value ≤ $950 requires misdemeanor treatment absent enumerated priors — 'aggregation' arguments limited by People v. Jimenez.

Prop 47

PC §1001.95 Diversion

Misdemeanor §496 is diversion-eligible; case dismissed on completion.

AB 3234

07 — Court Process

How PC §496 Receiving Stolen Property Cases Move Through Los Angeles Courts

§496 cases turn on the knowledge element.

  1. 1

    Step 1Arrest & Property Booking

    Property is booked into evidence and returned to victim after documentation.

  2. 2

    Step 2Filing Decision

    DA reviews value, defendant's record, and knowledge evidence — Prop 47 forces misdemeanor at ≤ $950.

  3. 3

    Step 3Arraignment

    OR or bail; restitution issue joined.

  4. 4

    Step 4Pretrial Motion Practice

    PC §1538.5 suppression if property discovered via search; Prop 47 valuation dispute.

  5. 5

    Step 5Preliminary Hearing (felony)

    Knowledge element litigated — receipts, price paid, source of goods.

  6. 6

    Step 6Trial or Plea

    PC §17(b), §1001.95 diversion, or misdemeanor plea.

  7. 7

    Step 7Sentencing / Restitution

    Full victim restitution and possible civil treble-damages exposure under §496(c).

Reviewed by Your Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin — Los Angeles Receiving Stolen Property Defense Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin has defended clients charged with receiving stolen property and related offenses in Los Angeles County courts — including Clara Shortridge Foltz, Van Nuys, Compton, and Pomona. He understands that these cases are won in the details: the suppression hearing that eliminates key evidence, the preliminary hearing cross-examination that exposes a weak witness, the penalty phase argument that keeps a client out of the worst outcome.

This page was written and reviewed by Daniel A. Rubin, Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, CA State Bar 302093, with 10+ years of experience defending clients charged under PC §496 in Los Angeles County. Last reviewed: July 2026.

CA Bar 302093 | Whittier Law School | Rising Star — Super Lawyers 2019–2023 | Receiving Stolen Property Cases Throughout LA County

See our full Receiving Stolen Property defense practice

09 — FAQs

PC §496 Receiving Stolen Property Questions — Los Angeles

Does Prop 47 apply to §496?

Yes for §496(a) — value ≤ $950 requires misdemeanor treatment absent enumerated priors. §496(d) stolen-vehicle cases are NOT affected by Prop 47.

Can I be sued civilly on top of the criminal case?

Yes. PC §496(c) — the California Supreme Court held in Siry Investment v. Farkhondehpour (2022) — authorizes triple actual damages plus attorney fees regardless of criminal outcome.

What if I didn't know it was stolen?

Lack of knowledge is a complete defense. But 'constructive knowledge' — facts a reasonable person would recognize as suspicious (dramatically low price, no receipt, altered serial numbers) — can satisfy the element under People v. Anderson.

Is §496 a strike?

No. §496 is not on the §667.5(c) or §1192.7(c) list and does not count as a strike.

Available 24/7 — Free Consultation

Charged With PC §496 Receiving Stolen Property?

The knowledge element is where §496 cases are won. Rubin Law, P.C. defends LA receiving-stolen-property cases and shuts down §496(c) civil exposure. Call (213) 723-2337.