(213) 723-2337Free Consultation
PCPenal CodeFelony

California Penal Code §504Embezzlement by Public Officer

PC §504 makes it embezzlement for any officer of the state, county, city, or municipal subdivision — or any deputy, clerk, or servant of such officer — to fraudulently appropriate money, property, or evidence of debt in their custody by virtue of that office. Punishment tracks PC §514, which for public-funds embezzlement is a felony (16 months, 2, or 3 years). Related but distinct from PC §424 (public-officer misappropriation of public funds).

Reviewed by Daniel S. Rubin, CA Bar 302093 · Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney · Embezzlement by Public Officer Cases in All LA County Courts

01 — Quick Facts

PC §504 — Embezzlement by Public Officer at a Glance

FactDetail
Full NameCalifornia Penal Code §504 — Embezzlement by Officer, Trustee, or Public Servant
Code TypePenal Code (PC)
ClassificationFelony (public-funds embezzlement)
Penalty16 months, 2, or 3 years county jail (§1170(h))
Punishment SourcePC §514 (punished as theft)
RestitutionMandatory — full amount
Public-Office BarPermanent under PC §1021 / Gov. Code §1770
Related StatutePC §424 (public-funds misappropriation)
§17(b)Not applicable (straight felony)
ImmigrationCIMT + aggravated felony risk
Free Consultation(213) 723-2337 — 24/7

01 — What Is PC §504?

What Is California Penal Code §504?

PC §504 Reads:

"Every officer of this state, or of any county, city, city and county, or other municipal corporation or subdivision thereof, and every deputy, clerk, or servant of that officer... who fraudulently appropriates it to any use or purpose not in the due and lawful execution of that trust, is guilty of embezzlement."

California Penal Code §504

PC §504 codifies embezzlement committed under color of public office. It applies to city treasurers, county clerks, school district accountants, elected officials, public-agency deputies, and their servants and contractors. The statute reaches misappropriation of both money and 'evidence of debt' (warrants, drafts, obligations). §504 requires fraudulent intent (unlike §424, which reaches negligent misappropriation of public funds). Common LA-County fact patterns include school-district petty-cash conversion, court-clerk fee diversion, and municipal-employee vendor-payment schemes.

Why This Law Matters

A §504 conviction ends any career in public service — Gov. Code §1770 disqualifies the person from all future public office, and PC §1021 permanently bars officeholding. It is a CIMT and aggravated-felony candidate under 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43)(M) when the loss exceeds $10,000. Rubin Law, P.C. defends by attacking the fraudulent-intent element (distinguishing accounting error or authorized use), negotiating restitution-based resolutions, and pursuing charge substitution to PC §484 or §503 to preserve immigration status.

02 — Elements of the Crime

Elements the Prosecution Must Prove Under PC §504

The People must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

01

Public-Officer or Servant Status

Defendant held a public office or served as a deputy, clerk, or servant of a public officer.

Defense angle: Challenge: private-contractor status, no official duty, or scope-of-office limitations may defeat §504 (may still fit §503).
02

Custody by Virtue of Office

The property came into defendant's possession because of the office — not personally or coincidentally.

Defense angle: Property received in a personal capacity, or already commingled, falls outside §504.
03

Fraudulent Appropriation

Defendant used or diverted the property inconsistent with the public trust.

Defense angle: Bookkeeping error, authorized reimbursement, or documented advance defeats appropriation.
04

Specific Intent to Defraud

Defendant acted with intent to defraud the public entity. Good faith negates §504 (though §424 may still apply).

Defense angle: Good-faith belief in authorization or entitlement is a complete defense.

04 — Penalties

Penalties for PC §504 Embezzlement by Public Officer in California

Penalty structure under PC §514.

ChargeCodePrison TermProbationStrike
§504 Felony (public-funds embezzlement)PC §504 / §51416 months, 2, or 3 years county jailAvailable (court discretion)No
Aggravated White-CollarPC §186.11+2, 3, or 5 yrs (loss > $100K, pattern)None if imposedNo
Excessive-TakingPC §12022.6+1–4 yrs based on loss tierN/ANo
Companion §424PC §4242, 3, or 4 yrs prison + permanent office barAvailableNo

Related Enhancements & Charges

Aggravated White-Collar

PC §186.11

Pattern of related felony fraud with loss > $100K adds 2–5 years.

Public-Office Disqualification

Gov. Code §1770 / PC §1021

Permanent bar from public office upon conviction.

Companion §424

PC §424

Public-officer negligence misappropriation — commonly charged in the alternative.

Companion §115

PC §115

Filing false records — often paired with §504.

Beyond the Sentence

  • Permanent disqualification from public office (Gov. Code §1770)
  • CIMT + aggravated-felony immigration exposure (loss > $10K)
  • Public-pension forfeiture under Gov. Code §7522.72
  • Mandatory restitution — full amount plus interest
  • License-loss (Bar, CPA, teaching credential)
  • Federal parallel exposure — 18 U.S.C. §666 (theft from federally-funded programs)

05 — Defense Strategies

How Rubin Law Defends PC §504 Embezzlement by Public Officer Charges

Rubin Law, P.C. defends this offense through the following strategies.

No Fraudulent Intent

Good-faith authorization, bookkeeping error, or documented advance defeats §504 intent (may downshift to §424).

Intent Element

Not Custody by Office

Property received in a personal capacity, or by a non-officer contractor, falls outside §504.

§504 Element

Authorized Reimbursement / Advance

Documented per-diem, expense advance, or reimbursement policies negate wrongful appropriation.

Authorization

Downshift to §503 / §484

Negotiated substitution to §503 or §484 preserves office eligibility and reduces immigration exposure.

Charge Substitution

Restitution-Based Resolution

Full restitution pre-plea supports probation, deferred-entry-of-judgment, and mitigated sentencing.

Restitution

Statute of Limitations

PC §801.5 gives 4 years from discovery for felony fraud — limitation defenses viable on old accounting entries.

PC §801.5

07 — Court Process

How PC §504 Embezzlement by Public Officer Cases Move Through Los Angeles Courts

Typical case flow through the LA County courts.

  1. 1

    Step 1Audit / Investigation

    Public-funds cases begin with agency audit and referral to DA Public Integrity Division. Rubin Law intervenes pre-filing.

  2. 2

    Step 2Grand Jury or Filing

    Charging via grand jury indictment or complaint. §504 typically joined with §424 and §115.

  3. 3

    Step 3Arraignment

    Booking-and-release common. Employment-suspension often precedes filing.

  4. 4

    Step 4Preliminary Hearing / §995

    Element litigation on custody-by-office and intent. §995 motion to dismiss where evidence is thin.

  5. 5

    Step 5Motion Practice

    Financial-record suppression (§1538.5), Brady discovery on audit methodology, and expert forensic accounting.

  6. 6

    Step 6Plea / Sentencing

    Primary targets: charge substitution to §503, restitution-based probation, and office-eligibility preservation.

Reviewed by Your Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin — Los Angeles Embezzlement by Public Officer Defense Attorney

Daniel S. Rubin has defended clients charged with embezzlement by public officer and related offenses in Los Angeles County courts — including Clara Shortridge Foltz, Van Nuys, Compton, and Pomona. He understands that these cases are won in the details: the suppression hearing that eliminates key evidence, the preliminary hearing cross-examination that exposes a weak witness, the penalty phase argument that keeps a client out of the worst outcome.

This page was written and reviewed by Daniel A. Rubin, Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, CA State Bar 302093, with 10+ years of experience defending clients charged under PC §504 in Los Angeles County. Last reviewed: July 2026.

CA Bar 302093 | Whittier Law School | Rising Star — Super Lawyers 2019–2023 | Embezzlement by Public Officer Cases Throughout LA County

See our full Embezzlement by Public Officer defense practice

09 — FAQs

PC §504 Embezzlement by Public Officer Questions — Los Angeles

What is PC §504?

PC §504 is embezzlement by a public officer or their deputy, clerk, or servant — fraudulent appropriation of money, property, or evidence of debt held by virtue of office. Punished as theft under §514.

How does §504 differ from §424?

§504 requires specific intent to defraud, while §424 reaches negligent misappropriation and 'temporary' unauthorized use of public funds. §424 covers public funds specifically; §504 covers all property held by virtue of office.

Is §504 a felony?

Public-funds embezzlement under §504/§514 is a felony punishable by 16 months, 2, or 3 years in county jail under §1170(h).

Will I lose my public pension?

Gov. Code §7522.72 requires forfeiture of pension benefits accrued from the first date of felony conduct in office. Restitution ordering also draws on pension assets.

Can I ever hold public office again?

No. Gov. Code §1770 and PC §1021 permanently disqualify a person convicted of embezzlement of public funds from holding public office in California.

Is §504 a deportable offense?

Yes — CIMT, and an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43)(M) when the loss exceeds $10,000. Immigration-safe charge substitution is essential.

Can I settle by paying back the money?

Restitution supports mitigation, probation, and charge substitution — but does not automatically dismiss the case. Pre-filing restitution is most powerful.

Available 24/7 — Free Consultation

Charged with PC §504 Public-Officer Embezzlement? Call Rubin Law.

§504 permanently bars you from public office, forfeits pension, and threatens deportation. Rubin Law, P.C. defends by attacking fraudulent intent, negotiating pre-filing resolution, and pursuing charge substitution to §503. Call (213) 723-2337.